football Edit

Why hasnt Texas Tech extended in Leach

When college football mavens talk about an "arms race," they are usually referring to stadiums and facilities. And, of course, there is indeed an ongoing battle among college football programs to upstage one another with their shiny new pigskin palaces.
But the most important weapon any program can have in its armory is a superior head coach. One can have state-of-the-art and spectacular facilities yet still be mired in mediocrity because of a deficiency at the head coach position. Look no further than an adjacent state for confirmation of this.
And just as football programs wage cold war with stadiums and weight rooms, they also joust and duel to acquire and maintain the best coaches in the business. Fortunately, Texas Tech already has one (the 2008 season will dispel any lingering doubts on this score) in the person of Mike Leach. Unfortunately, however, Leach has less than two and a half years remaining on his contract and the silence emanating from the Tech Athletic Department on this matter is deafening. It is also getting a bit ominous.
Currently, Leach is the Big 12's seventh highest paid coach after Kansas' Mark Mangino and other head men around the league signed contract extensions. Nobody in their right mind, however, would dare argue that Leach is merely the seventh best coach in the Big 12.
Bob Stoops and Mack Brown, operating with colossal infrastructural advantages, have accomplished more than Leach over the last several years. But they are the only coaches in the Big 12 one can say that about. OSU's Mike Gundy, Baylor's Art Briles and A&M's Mike Sherman are not in Leach's ballpark. Neither are Kansas State's Ron Prince, Nebraska's Bo Pelini and Iowa State's Gene Chizik.
Kansas' Mangino (currently 37-36) and Missouri's Gary Pinkel (currently 49-37) were staring down the barrel of the stun gun going into the 2007 season, but by virtue of tremendous years, pulled fat from the fire. Prior to 2007, however, they were borderline failures at their respective schools. And neither has demonstrated consistency remotely comparable to Leach's despite not having to face Texas and Oklahoma every year.
Then there is Leach's bowl record (5-3), which is vastly superior to any coach in Texas Tech history, is identical to Mack Brown's in terms of winning percentage, and blows Bob Stoops' 4-5 mark out of the water.
And this is not even taking into consideration the program's 79% graduation rate, and the huge increase in attendance, which has further solidified the program's status as the Athletic Department's only real financial bellcow.
But citing evidence of Leach's coaching and managerial prowess is superfluous. It is akin to proving the sky is blue. Everybody knows it already. The questions are what are Gerald Myers and the Athletic Department going to do about it and when are they going to do it?
Leach is 65-37 overall (.637 winning percentage), so making him the Big 12's third or fourth highest paid coach makes sense and the time has arrived to hammer out that contract. This is imminently reasonable. It is entirely fair. So why wait for the situation to become acute before signaling Tech's cast-iron intent to present Leach with a contract that will pay him market value and keep him in Lubbock well into the future?
Leach probably does not want to be distracted by contract negotiations during the season. But, of course, that is not the issue. What is at issue is getting the ball rolling and creating a very public impression that the Athletic Department values Leach and will do everything in its capacity to ensure that he continues to helm the Red Raider football program.
The benefits of taking the initiative are manifold. First, doing so would undercut the recruiting trail mantra that Leach will bolt from Lubbock at the first opportunity. Attacking Leach's commitment to the Tech program, no matter how ludicrous, is a tactic employed by the opposition. Better to negate the ploy now rather than allow that particular card to remain in the deck.
Second, taking the initiative would create further goodwill between the Athletic Department and Leach, and would make the actual contract negotiations go more smoothly and amicably.
And third, this approach would go some length toward warding off all but the most brazen suitors for Leach's services after the 2008 season is complete. And if the Red Raiders are all they are currently cracked up to be, you can bet your sweet bippy that some of the heavyweights will come a-calling. They will recognize quality coaching when they see it.
Does Texas Tech?